Quick test Professional is widely expended check automation device mainly for operational testing. QTP has lots of more progressed options & HP urges that all being & newly exploiter should start with QTP instead of Win Runner.
Here I am looking back HP Quick test Professional device for Automation proving.
Features savings plan-
* Ease of use.
* Simple interface.
* Presents the test case as a business workflow to the test (easier to understand).
* Uses a real programming language (Microsoft VBScript) with numerous resources available.
* Quick Test Pro is easier for a non-technical person to adapt to the test cases and create jobs, compared to Win Runner.
* Data table integration better and easier to use than Win Runner.
* Test Run Iterations / Data driving a test are easier and better implemented with Quick Test.
* Easier parameterization of Win Runner.
* Can enhance existing Quick Test scripts without the application of the "under test" is available, using the Active Screen.
* You can create and implement the Microsoft Object Model (Outlook objects, ADO objects, file system objects, supports DOM, WSH, etc.).
* Better object identification mechanism.
* Numerous existing functions available for implementation - both from within Quick Test Pro and VBScript.
* QTP supports. NET development environment
* XML Support
* The report of the test is more robust in Quick Test compared to Win Runner.
* Integrates with Test Director and Win Runner (can throw Win Runner scripts from Quick Test).
0 comments:
Post a Comment